Abortion “Defending the Unborn.”
Matthew 25:40 > And the king will answer and say to them, Assuredly, “I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me.”
1 Timothy 6:13 > I urge you in the sight of God who gives life to all things and before Christ Jesus who witnessed the good confession before Pontius Pilate,
14>that you keep this commandment without spot blameless until our Lord Jesus Christ’s appearing.
If you’re faced with an unwanted pregnancy, please read the beginning if this article about the Bible says about abortion.
Lets go to the Bible, the Word has to say.
Did you know it’s a crime to destroy an eagle’s egg in the United States? Yet mothers are willing to murder their own children and it is permitted. Women today society are careless and completely mixed up! Sex is allowed among young girls at a young age. From 11 up. I understand in some cultures a young girl is a woman when she reaches puberty. The physical part may be there but not the mental part.
And the scourge of abortion os worldwide. It had been reported years ago that
“Nearly a third of pregnancies in Europe end in Europe and the United States is not far behind.”
Girls today are careless in so many ways. Young girls of today have lost value and respect for themselves. Parents are to scared to chastise our children. The laws on the side of the children.
In China the number is an unthinkable 23 million per year. (China is only aloud one child, and most only want boys because they are able to field).
How does ending life in this way find such widespread acceptance? Many in favor a abortion make the woeful argument that what is growing in a woman’s womb in not really a human being. As long as the heart is beating, an unborn child is a, Human being right from the moment of conception. There is a reason for and only God. Has the right to say what happens. A child at any stage is not (or human) a piece of tissue.
Investigative Report A Small Victory for the Unborn:
By Delana Forsyth
Abortion “Defending the Unborn.”
And the king will answer and say to them,
Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me.
1 Timothy 6:13>
I urge you in the sight of God who gives life to all things and before Christ Jesus who witnessed the good confession before Pontius Pilate,
14>that you keep this commandment without spot blame until our Lord Jesus Christ’s appearance.
If you’re faced with an unwanted pregnancy, please read the beginning if this article about the Bible says about abortion.
Let’s go to the Bible, the Word has to say.
Did you know it’s a crime to destroy an eagle’s egg in the United States? Yet mothers are willing to murder their own children and it is permitted. Women today’s society are careless and completely mixed up! Sex is allowed among young girls at a young age. From 11 up. I understand in some cultures a young girl is a woman when she reaches puberty. The physical part may be there but not the mental part.
And the scourge of abortion is worldwide. It had been reported years ago that
“Nearly a third of pregnancies in Europe end in Europe and the United States is not far behind.”
Girls today are careless in so many ways. Young girls of today have lost value and respect for themselves. Parents are too scared to chastise our children. The laws on the side of the children.
In China the number is an unthinkable 23 million per year. (China is only allowed one child, and most only want boys because they are able to the fields).
How does ending life in this way find such widespread acceptance? Many in favor abortion make the woeful argument that what is growing in a woman’s womb in not really a human being. If the heart is beating, an unborn child is a, Human being right from the moment of conception. There is a reason for and only God. Has the right to say what happens. A child at any stage is not (or human) a piece of tissue.
The case involves the constitutionality of a Louisiana state law requiring doctors who preform abortion to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. The Supreme Court struck down a similar law in 2016, but the Court of Appeals or the Fifth Circuit upheld Louisiana’s statute, holding that the requirement did not impose a substantial burden on women’s abortion access. The Fifth Circuit explained how the Louisiana law had minimal impact on abortion clinics within the state.
Earlier this year Supreme Court granted a stay of the Fifth Circuit’s decision and the abortion facilities challenging the law asked the Court to review the case. The State of Louisiana will defend the Fifth Circuit’s ruling before the Court, but the state has also asked the Court to consider the issue of whether abortion facilities should be continued to be allowed to challenge state health laws regulating abortion clinics. The so-called “right to abortion” belongs to pregnant women. Yet the abortion clinics industry has filed countless lawsuits claiming that they have the right to defend women’s access to abortion. As a rule, in our legal system, you cannot sue to defend someone else’s rights. Most abortion facilities care much more about their bottom line than about the health and safety of women. It is that these abortion facilities are permitted to challenge every state legislative effort to protect women’s health.
Where do y put an end to Bull Sh! Planned Parenthood is nothing but a joke. I was 12 years old when they put me on birth control. Hello, I was 12! Really Planned Parenthood has never cared about women’s health. I can remember the lies they told me to get put me on the birth control. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania allowed this terrible to do what it wanted to me because I was underage. The only nice thing about the place is you can get free condoms.
The safety of a young girls at any Planned Parenthood is a huge health concern. Too many abortion clinics have abysmal track records, and yet they want the power to challenge state and safety regulations of these sick clinics. We cannot allow this to happen. Most of these abortion clinics are involved in mass murder of every ethnic person in the world. History has shown we can’t just take their word for anything, when it comes to health care in their facilities because they take young girls without insurance.
As the AMICUS brief stated:
Moreover, abortion businesses, which have a profit motives for women to choose abortion, (should serve 15 years just for the thought of murdering their child). They can’t be relied upon to present the full picture. Indeed, such businesses may be using statistics – despite the flaws described above. The impact of this case could be monumental. In fact, it could impact other pro-life laws. Earlier this year we told you about another historic victory for defenseless, unborn babies, when the State of Louisiana took a bold, bipartisan stand to protect life. The Louisiana’s Democrat Governor John Bel Edwards got passed the pro-life “heartbeat bill” in 79-23 vote.
At the time he signed the bill, Governor Edwards made a statement calling on all other state lawmakers to protect life:
“As I prepare to sign this bill, I call on the overwhelming bipartisan majority of legislators who voted for it to join me in continuing to build a better Louisiana that cares for the least among us and provides more opportunity for everyone.”
Obamacare requires every American to purchase health insurance, it requires every state to establish health insurance exchanges, and it dramatically expands Medicaid. Each of these – private health insurance program, exchanges, and Medicaid – can, and in some case are required to, provide coverage for abortions. The result is hundreds pf millions of dollars being funneled to the abortion industry every year and the greatest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade.
We must defend the precious unborn babies and support laws that offer alternatives to desperate mothers in crisis – sometimes the abortion industry is firmly against.
As the Supreme Court prepares to hear this case, we need you with us.
(CNN) — Reproductive rights advocates are concerned over a proposed abortion bill in Ohio that they say would not only ban abortion after six weeks of pregnancy but also require a medical procedure that’s never been done and may not actually work.
The bill could also lead to the death penalty for abortion providers in some cases.
Ohio House Bill 413 is 723 pages and is catching international attention.
RELATED: Abortion bill suggests doctors preimplant ectopic pregnancies
It would make it possible to charge doctors who end pregnancies with “abortion murder,” facing 15 years to life in prison unless the mother’s life was in danger or in certain aggravated cases, punishable by death.
“In a lot of ways, I think it makes Ohio look extreme and foolish” said Jessie Hill, associate dean for Academic Affairs at Case Western’s School of Law.
Hill specializes in Constitutional Law and Reproductive Rights.
“It is extremely unusual for a law that is purported to be a pro-life measure to go this far and to threaten people with the death penalty for seeking a healthcare procedure,” Hill said.
H.B. 413 would also require doctors try to save ectopic pregnancies, where the pregnancy is growing outside of the uterus, by replanting the fetus in the uterus — something even pro-life OBGYNs argue isn’t medically possible. Only god has the right to make this dissension no us.
“You can’t find a single medical expert to support the idea that there is this treatment, a viable treatment that is described in the bill,” Hill said.
When Gov. Mike DeWine signed the heartbeat abortion bill into law in April, he did so knowing that measure would be challenged in the courts as it immediately was.
“We have a vehicle for the United States Supreme Court so that should it be ready to do so it could revisit some of its prior rulings,” DeWine said.
Specifically, Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion across the country.
Ohio is one of several states with cases seeking to challenge Roe v. Wade — a move that pro-life groups feel faces greater odds once Justice Brett Kavanaugh was seated.
All of this is playing out ahead of 2020.
“We have a big chunk of our electorate on both sides that vote on that issue alone and they could agree with you on 99 percent of the other issues but if you differ with them on the issue of abortion you will never get their vote,” said Tom Sutton, a political analyst.
I pray that one day New York sees this law that Ohio is first to put into law for the unborn. Nobody has the right to kill anyone. The unborn don’t have the ability to defend themselves. On March 29th, 2020, there is a movie coming out called Unplanned. This story takes us to a whole new look at apportions from the unborn babies’ view. This movie will make you cry. I just seen the preview of the movie and I could not move. I sat and cried. My heart acts just setting here writing this article.
At one time in my life I was at one time for apportions: I was for those who got pregnant while being raped. I made that comment to my mother. She told me, “if I thought that you would not be here.” Loud and clear. After my mother gave me that bit of information about my life, I have been helping women understand that only God can judge us. And that there are many people out there that would love to have a child that can’t have one. One person’s pain can bring another person joy. No one has the right to play God in any way. When you try to do God’s job, your destiny will not be good. But once you allow god to be in your life everything in life gets easier. God loves you. I know what I am talking about. I have believed in God all my life. I held on to the love of Jesus being raised in a family who has always believed in God. I have gone through being beaten to every inch of my life by my dad at the age of two. My mother threw her body over mine to save my life. My daddy beat me often, later in life I forgave him.
I was raped off and on for years by members in my family over and over. I got one simple piece of advice from someone who I, thought was to be my best friend (looking back she wasn’t), don’t fight. I was always fighting people from me; I still do. Being young as I fought, I would get beat up more. After a while I just learned to stop fighting. NO still means NO.
The days of pro-life advocates pushing back against Roe v. Wade are over. Radical abortion activists have hijacked the Democratic Party and are ushering in a wave of laws that remove all protections from unborn children and even those born alive. The line has moved from abortion to infanticide.
It was on the anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision that made abortion legal across the country that New York lawmakers gave a standing ovation for legislation that would not only allow the killing of unborn children up until the moment of birth, it also stripped away protections for children who survive the life-taking procedure. The radical departure from previous law on the issue now takes away an infant’s right to a life outside the mother’s womb.
New York’s murderous law has been touted as a crowning achievement for Gov. Andrew Cuomo. The former altar boy has heard calls from Catholic bishops across the country for his excommunication. If Christians in other parts of the nation think that New York values are extreme and outside the church, the trend among Democrats has taken root in other states as well.
In Rhode Island, considered among the bluest of blue states, state Reps. Edith Ajello and Sen. Gayle Goldin have been floating a bill called “Reproductive Health Care Act” since 2017. The bill would eliminate any and all restriction for a woman to have an abortion up until the moment of birth. The bill seeks to change the language in existing law that puts some restrictions on abortion when the unborn child is deemed viable.
The new language would say that “the state, nor any of its agencies, or political subdivisions shall… restrict an individual person from terminating that individual’s pregnancy after fetal viability when necessary to preserve the health or life of that individual…”
R.I. state lawmakers are pressing to change existing law to include abortion up until the moment of birth if the mother’s “health or life” are at risk. While life-threatening situations would be rare, the use of the word “health” would likely extend to mental health as well. Should woman become emotionally distraught and decide to have a late-term abortion out of fear, the child would be killed. In many cases, women suffer from extreme guilt and anxiety for the remainder of their lives after such choices.
Like New York, liberal extremists are directing the party’s agenda, and abortion clinics such as Planned Parenthood and individual abortion doctors are big Democrat campaign donors. Both Gov. Gina Raimondo and Secretary of State Nellie Gerbera have ties to abortion money. By contrast, the pro-life lobby is relatively powerless in the union’s smallest state.
In Virginia, legislation has also been introduced to allow abortion right up until the moment of birth.
“How late in the third trimester could a physician perform an abortion if he indicated it would impair the mental health of the woman?” GOP Delegate Todd Gilbert reportedly asked the bill’s sponsor Kathy Tran.
“Through the third trimester,” Tran reportedly said “The third trimester goes all the way up to 40 weeks. . . . I don’t think we have a limit in the bill.”
The state’s governor had a further take on the proposed legislation that would go beyond children still in the womb. He indicated in a live interview that children’s lives could be conceivably taken post-birth.
“If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam reportedly said in a live interview. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
That discussion could result in the baby being legally murdered under the proposed Virginia legislation supported by the governor.
Given the reckless disregard for life by state-level Democrats, conservative Republicans in Congress have been moving forward with legislation designed to protect the lives of unborn children, implement criminal penalties against doctors who perform late-term abortions, and eliminate the possibility of post-delivery murder.
Pro-life Republicans proposed the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act in response to states such as New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia. Supported by senators such as Florida’s Marco Rubio and South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham among others, the bill says that “any health care practitioner present” is required to “exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child” as a “reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to any other child born alive at the same gestational age.”
Democrats have blocked the bill from receiving a floor vote. Although gatherings such as the March for Life and others are garnering increased support, pro-life supporters are now fighting a battle that goes far beyond Roe v. Wade. Democrats have been killing babies for years. The Democratic evolved from a Communist Party.
“Super-Youth” Capsule Mimics $100,000 Stem
Cell Therapy; Replaces Billions of
Old, Tired Cells with New YOUNG Ones
The rich aren’t just getting richer…
Now they’re getting YOUNGER too!
What’s their secret?
They’re using $100,000 stem cell therapies that replace worn-out, old cells with brand-new young ones.
New Yorker magazine says this expensive new therapy works like a charm: “Hollywood elites and billionaires are growing younger…”
Harvard Medical School reports “The findings represent a breakthrough in aging research…”
And Time Magazine proposes that the process of replacing aging cells may be as “simple as plucking out gray hairs.”
But now there’s something better and safer… and well within reach of the average person like me and you! It’s a remarkable “super-youth” capsule that replenishes your natural supply of stem cells…
Naturally – as in, just the way nature intended.
Old cells hobbled by a lifetime of abuse and bad habits can now be literally replaced with new ones. Energy levels, your heart, your joints, your brain – your whole outlook on life is profoundly improved.
The best part is it starts happening within minutes.
It’s working for aging Hollywood starlets, Silicon Valley and Wall Street millionaires, and its helping “over the hill” athletes regain their championship glory…
And now it can work for you, too.
This is the reason for the high demanded for abortions. People are willing to kill for their own benefit. Sick!
Three years ago, I had been diagnosed with Lupus an uncurable dieses. I was doing research about these horrible dieses; I came across something on stem cell research. I had contacted some place in California to find out about it. I was told it was a new kind of stem cell: man made like cloning. Including means that if you’re taking something in cloning it you must take it from something original. That means they had to use baby stem cells just to do the research for the lupus issues. I had to think long and hard about the issue that was at hand it wasn’t very easy, but I prayed and trust God to do the right thing for my life. And eventually because I listened to God’s way, I have been cured of this incurable disease called lupus. There is no reason to use stem cells for any reason for any type of research no matter Wat. God giveth God take it period when you end a life it is on your hands and it should be on your conscience not just the hands. Murder is murder no matter which way you look at it and it is a sin yes Christ died for our sins but we have no right to take anybody’s life no matter how big or how small the person may be it is still God’s decision on how to treat people not ours.
This is how passionate I am to help have babies. I have letters sent to me to help as many women as I can this letter is from a friend of mine:
Numerous pregnancy centers in our affiliate network are looking for volunteers. When I saw these requests, I thought of you.
I know you are passionate to save the unborn from abortion. I also know you believe that every parent considering abortion should receive whatever help they need to choose life. Can you become a volunteer at your local center?
You can use this secure link to learn more about the many ways to help your community through volunteering and also find your nearest pregnancy center. Give them a call to learn what their needs are and how you can help!
Delana, even if you can’t volunteer, please join me in praying for God to raise up thousands of new volunteers to enable our network to save more lives. And…if you can volunteer, please tell them Care Net national sent you!
Thank you for your support,
Director of Development
44180 Riverside Parkway, Ste. 200
Lansdowne, VA 20176
There is a link you can use to get help! Please use this link.
This is only one letter I have from a close friend of mine I have many letters in my email showing how to fight against abortion add I would like to thank all those who have given me their time and their Peace of Mind and their views on the abortion issues we’re all here to save lives not take lives away. I have gone too CNN I’ve gone to the C-SPAN, Fox News period I’ve gone to multiple churches from taxes to Ohio and around the world to get this interview and interviews from multiple people there are many they do not want to put their names in period And I don’t want to give up all my Contacts either. And much of my writing in my investigation IO all thanks to God himself and CBN 700 club Pat Robinson in all those who are at the CDN broadcasting system thank you for your help.
The Supreme Court just agreed to hear a major abortion case that will determine whether states can protect innocent babies and mothers.
Louisiana passed a law requiring abortionists to have hospital admitting privileges to protect health and safety; but after pressure from abortionists, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked it, endangering countless unborn babies and their mothers.
Without this protection, babies who survive abortion could still face grave danger, as could mothers who suffer complications during the horrible procedure.
We can’t just trust abortionists to do what is right for the health and well-being of babies who somehow survive their botched abortions.
This law could be an innocent child’s second chance.
The Supreme Court is acting and so are we. We’re preparing to file a critical new brief supporting this pro-life law.
We must be the voice of defenseless babies and protect the health of these desperate women in crisis.
The Supreme Court has agreed to reconsider the law. Overturning it could put the lives of countless babies and mothers in jeopardy.
Take crucial action to defend defenseless babies at the Supreme Court TODAY.
ACLJ Chief Counsel
This are two letters written to me personally one from the chief counsel ACLJ and the other one from some private organization down in Virginia that are trying to stop abortions.
Last minute interview, from the Catholic Church:
U.S. bishops said abortion should be Catholic voters’ top priority. Here’s why they’re right.
Editor’s note: This piece is part of a series on abortion and politics. For other views, read “Should abortion be the most important issue for Catholic voters? Here’s a better question” and “After 50 years, the U.S. bishops’ focus on abortion has done little to change hearts and minds.”
When the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops held its annual fall meeting, the biggest news from its deliberations was the disagreement between several members over whether it is right to describe the issue of abortion as the “preeminent priority” for U.S. Catholics.
As bishops crafted an introductory letter to accompany “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship,” the U.S.C.C.B.’s document on voting, Bishop Robert McElroy of San Diego spoke in favor of adding a paragraph to clarify that Pope Francis views a number of other social issues as holding the same moral importance as abortion.
Bishop McElroy said the inclusion of the word “preeminent” before the letter’s mention of abortion is at least discordant with and perhaps inconsistent with the pope’s teaching. “It is not Catholic teaching that abortion is the preeminent issue that we face in the world of Catholic social teaching,” he added.
Archbishop Charles Chanut of Philadelphia pushed back against this claim, even as he agreed with Bishop McElroy that the pope’s language could be added to the letter. “I am against anyone stating that our stating [abortion] is ‘preeminent’ is contrary to the teaching of the pope. That isn’t true,” he said, noting that it “sets up an artificial battle” between the U.S. bishops and Pope Francis.
Judging from voting patterns, a great number of U.S. Catholics believe that the evil of abortion is merely one social issue among many.
Though it is not clear how much weight U.S. Catholics give in practice to the bishops’ document as they make their choices at the ballot box, these disputes matter. Judging from voting patterns, a great number of Catholics in the United States believe something along the lines of what Bishop McElroy said: that the evil of abortion is merely one social issue among many, a moral problem to consider alongside the church’s teaching on a number of other evils.
To be sure, many Americans who describe themselves as Catholic no longer practice the faith—and thus are less likely to consider church teaching when they vote—but a large number of those who do consider church teaching choose to vote for Democratic candidates, even as those candidates have almost uniformly become dedicated to policies that preserve and expand access to abortion.
[Want to discuss politics with other America readers? Join our Facebook discussion group, moderated by America’s writers and editors.]
Even though, as Archbishop Chaput said, the church holds that all human lives have equal dignity—and that reality has various policy implications open to prudential disagreements among the faithful on issues like immigration and the climate—Catholic teaching has long held that the right to life is paramount. In other words, Catholics must prioritize the fact that every innocent human being has a right not to be killed, a truth that abortion directly attacks.
Catholics must prioritize the fact that every innocent human being has a right not to be killed, a truth that abortion directly attacks.
Here is how Pope St. John Paul II put it in his apostolic exhortation “Christifideles Laici” in 1988: “The common outcry, which is justly made on behalf of human rights—for example, the right to health, to home, to work, to family, to culture—is false and illusory if the right to life, the most basic and fundamental right and the condition for all other personal rights, is not defended with maximum determination.”
Though the pope goes on to discuss a number of issues that violate human dignity, his writing makes clear that church teaching places a particular emphasis on opposing abortion because the right to life at conception is a prerequisite for every other human right.
“Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship,” meanwhile, warns against a “moral equivalence that makes no ethical distinctions between different kinds of issues involving human life and dignity.
We are called to defend the least among us, and there is no more weak and defenseless population than unborn human beings.
“The direct and intentional destruction of innocent human life from the moment of conception until natural death is always wrong and is not just one issue among many. It must always be opposed,” the document says. Like “Christoffel’s Laici,” the bishops’ statement urges Catholics to take seriously “other serious threats to human life and dignity,” including war, environmental degradation and racism, but it carves out an unequivocal Catholic duty to oppose the direct killing of innocent human beings through abortion and euthanasia.
It would be a mistake to think that these statements are relevant only to forming one’s conscience when it comes to voting. Of course, Catholics can and must choose to defend innocent life, including the unborn, in a number of ways aside from how they cast their votes. But politics does matter, and the politicians that U.S. Catholics choose to support send a message about what we believe matters most.
“When a candidate supports abortion rights or assisted suicide the Catholic should have no doubt that this is opposed to the teaching of the church and should not vote for such a candidate,” C. C. Pecknold, a theology professor at The Catholic University of America, told Catholic News Agency before the 2016 presidential election.
If Catholics do not prioritize protecting human life at its very beginning in the womb and at its most vulnerable, our witness is weakened even if we go on to defend the dignity of human life at the margins in a variety of other circumstances. We are called to defend the least among us, and there is no more weak and defenseless population than unborn human beings.
This reality is not in tension with our call as Catholics to protect human life in a number of other ways, but especially considering that nearly one million unborn human beings are extinguished by abortion in the United States each year, we must prioritize using our votes and our voices to oppose that grave evil.